Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Money necessary for the payment of the expense of a journey undertaken, which is carried in the trunk of a passenger is part of his baggage, and if lost while in the custody of a carrier for transportation it is liable. (Merrill v. Grinnell, 30 N.Y. 594; Fairfax v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co., 73 id. 167; 2 Red. R.R. 59.) But carries do not undertake to carry and safely deliver the effects of travelers not delivered into their custody, and it cannot be held that money…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merrill v. . GrinnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Lewis v. New York Sleeping Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Foulke v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Goldstein v. . Pullman Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Adams v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Holmes v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API