Legal Opinion

Stanley-Thompson Liquor Co. v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1917No. 8905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Las Animas District Court, Hon. A. Watson McHendrie, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*457Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

The Stanley-Thompson Liquor Company, plaintiff in error, was the owner of certain gambling devices, some of which were stored in the back room of its place of business, and some in a public warehouse. The record shows that they were purchased some three years before the proceedings here under review, as a part of the property taken over by the plaintiff in error on purchasing a wholesale liquor business.

They were ordered to be destroyed under the authority of section 1795, R. S. 1908, and it is of this order that complaint is made.

The undisputed evidence is that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  3. Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Spalding v. PrestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
  5. J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Lee v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Approximately Fifty-Nine Gambling Devices v. People Ex Rel. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. People v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Igoe v. JoyntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API