Legal Opinion
Luxottica Group, S.P.A. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 00 Civ. 2836(WHP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
Luxottica Group S.p.A. (“Luxottica”) moves for an order to compel Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated (“B & L”) to submit disputes concerning the purchase of a business to an independent accountant for an arbitration or appraisal. B & L asks this Court to deny Luxottica’s petition and requests further discovery. For the reasons stated below, Luxottica’s motion is granted and B & L’s application is denied.
BACKGROUND
In 1998, B & L, a New York corporation, began to explore the possibility of selling its worldwide non-prescription sun-glass business. (See…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kashfi v. Phibro-Salomon, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between Penn Central Corp. & Consolidated Rail Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Arbitration between American Silk Mills Corp. & Meinhard-Commercial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Jayhawk AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Questrom v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E Trade Financial Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Severstal U.S. Holdings, LLC v. RG Steel, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Entech, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002