Legal Opinion
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Jayhawk Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1991No. 90 Civ. 5307 (RPP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (“MHT”) moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment against all defendants and also moves for dismissal of defendant B.B. Andersen’s counterclaims. At oral argument on May 13, 1991, the Court granted summary judgment to MHT for the reasons stated below. 1 2For the same reasons, the counterclaims of defendant Andersen are also dismissed.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The present suit is an action to recover the principal sum of $1,811,865.57, plus interest,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. D'Evori International Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Edison Stone Corp. v. 42nd Street Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pan Am Corp. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- La Mirada Products Co., Inc. v. WASSALL PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. LelakisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.