Legal Opinion
E Trade Financial Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AG
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2006No. 05 CIV.0902(RWS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Deutsche Bank AG (“Defendant” or “Deutsche Bank”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiffs E*Trade Financial Corporation (“E*Trade Financial”) and E*Trade Bank (“E*Trade Bank”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). The Plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed. R.Civ.P., for leave to file its first amended complaint (“FAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion of Deutsche Bank is denied, and the motion of Plaintiffs is granted.
These sophisticated, well-advised…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Hosking v. TPG Capital Management, L.P. (In re Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- It's a 10, Inc. v. PH Beauty Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- E TRADE FINANCIAL CORP. v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- RBS Holdings, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Century, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.