Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
This product liability action raises a question of first impression in California: whether we should adopt the “sophisticated user” doctrine and defense to negate a manufacturer’s duty to warn of a product’s potential danger when the plaintiff has (or should have) advance knowledge of the product’s inherent hazards. The defense is specifically applied to plaintiffs who knew or should have known of the product’s hazards, and it acts as an exception to manufacturers’ general duty to warn consumers. (See Rest.2d Torts, § 402A.)
The federal courts have adopted the doctrine as an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.