Standard Rectifier Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Petitioners seek annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation benefits for permanent disability issued in favor of respondent Edith J. Whiddon. We have concluded that the application for benefits was timely filed, that other contentions advanced by petitioners are also devoid of merit, and that the award should be affirmed.
Mrs. Whiddon, the employee, testified that her work required many repetitive motions of her arms, neck and shoulders, averaging 5,000 movements a day, five or six days a week. In April 1961 she first noticed aching in her arms, neck and head, and reported it to her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gobel v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- J. T. Thorp, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.