Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 22, 2010No. Civil 08-cv-358-JLPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge.
This products liability case presents numerous disputes over the admissibility of expert testimony. Plaintiff Karen Bartlett, who took the generic drug Sulindac and suffered severe side effects, brought suit against the drug’s manufacturer, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, asserting state-law claims of strict products liability and negligence based on defective design. She alleges, in particular, that Sulindac’s safety risks outweigh its medical benefits, making it an unreasonably dangerous product. This court has subject-matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- David Owen v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and the Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- MMG Insurance v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Wolfe v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- West v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.