Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided January 5, 2011No. Civil 08-cv-358-JLPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge.
This products liability case arises out of severe and permanent injuries, including blindness, that plaintiff Karen Bartlett suffered after ingesting sulindac, a prescription drug manufactured by the defendant, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company. Bartlett brought claims against Mutual for strict liability (defective design), strict Lability (failure to warn), fraud, and negligence under New Hampshire law. This court granted summary judgment to Mutual on nearly all of the claims. See Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm. Co., 731 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.N.H.2010)…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Jackson v. E-Z-Go Div. of Textron, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.