Legal Opinion
Lockary v. Kayfetz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1990No. 87-15044PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, individuals, a partnership, and its general partners, are current and former owners of undeveloped land who contest the grant of summary judgment to appellees, a public utility district and its directors. On appeal, the individual appellants assert that appellees’ refusal to grant water hookups to them constitutes a regulatory taking of their land and violates their constitutional rights to substantive due process and equal protection. Furthermore, individual appellants argue that the procedures used by appellees to enact a water moratorium and grant water…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Squaw Valley Development Company Squaw Valley Ski Corporation Squaw Valley Preserve v. Martin Goldberg Harold SingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Matthew Lockary v. Paul Kayfetz Victor Amoroso Mary Lowry Diana Lopez Fransworth Frederick B. McClellan Peter Warshall v. Pacific Legal FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo GrandeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dumas v. KippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.