Beckham v. Klein
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The principal question we address in this appeal is whether a real estate broker who has not procured a sale under an express agreement may nevertheless become entitled to compensation for services rendered the seller under principles of quantum meruit. We answer this question in the negative and affirm the judgment below.
By their first assignment of error, plaintiffs contend that the evidence before the court was insufficient to support the findings numbered 13, 20, and 21. A trial court’s findings of fact in a non-jury trial have the force and effect of a jury verdict and are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- RANLO SUPPLY COMPANY v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Catoe v. Helms Construction & Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Industrial & Textile Piping, Inc. v. Industrial Rigging Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Catoe v. Helms Const. & Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Carolantic Realty, Inc. v. Matco Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.