Legal Opinion
Hassane v. Lawrence
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 1993No. 11687PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant on his counterclaim.1 The plaintiff claims that the judgment, which was rendered in accordance with an attorney trial referee’s report, was improper because (1) the trial court’s directive that the trial referee state the basis on which it made its award of damages constituted a rejection of the trial referee’s report, (2) the trial referee improperly concluded that the defendant had been locked out of the premises, (3) the defendant’s property had *725become fixtures, and (4) the trial referee incorrectly determined…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Hedderman v. Robert Hall of Waterbury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Ives v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- National Elevator Industry Pension, Welfare & Educational Fund v. ScrivaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Kubish v. ZegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Schmaling v. SchmalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Gurland v. Barber, No. Cv-93-0704741 (Sep. 4, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.