State Compensation Fund v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Judge.
This certiorari petition by the State Compensation Fund, the workmen’s compensation carrier, calls into question respondent Industrial Commission’s interpretation of what is now A.R.S. § 23-1065(A)(4). That provision was passed by the legislature in 1963, to encourage the hiring of handicapped persons by providing, in certain enumerated circumstances, that there be a sharing of compensation liability between the carrier and the Industrial Commission’s Special Fund established by A.R.S. § 23-1065 (A). 1
The underlying claim involves an employee who suffered from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Develop. Auth. of Cty. of Pinal v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Watkins v. Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Coleman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Bearce v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Schuff Steel v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Salt River Project/Bechtel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.