Legal Opinion

Industrial Develop. Auth. of Cty. of Pinal v. Nelson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1973No. 11059PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

Petitioner, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pinal, is a corporation organized and existing under the provisions of A.R.S. § 9-1151 et seq. For the sake of brevity petitioner will be referred to in this opinion as IDA.

IDA brought a petition for special action in this Court against the Attorney General, seeking an order from this Court directing the Attorney General to issue an opinion that certain bond issues of IDA are in conformity with the applicable provisions of law. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 5, of the Arizona…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lerch v. Maryland Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of SikestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API