Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1. The court of appeals set aside an Industrial Commission award and decision for reimbursement under A.R.S. § 23-1065(C). Special Fund Div. v. Industrial Comm’n (Burrell), 189 Ariz. 162, 939 P.2d 795 (App.1997). We granted review to clear up confusion in a number of court of appeals cases by deciding whether a written record establishing the existence of a pre-hiring disability, coupled with contemporaneous oral testimony regarding the nature of the disability, was sufficient to establish the employer’s knowledge required under § 23-1065(C). We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Garrison v. LukeArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Gilbane Co. v. PoulasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools v. ThorellNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.