Legal Opinion

Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1998No. CV-97-0322-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1. The court of appeals set aside an Industrial Commission award and decision for reimbursement under A.R.S. § 23-1065(C). Special Fund Div. v. Industrial Comm’n (Burrell), 189 Ariz. 162, 939 P.2d 795 (App.1997). We granted review to clear up confusion in a number of court of appeals cases by deciding whether a written record establishing the existence of a pre-hiring disability, coupled with contemporaneous oral testimony regarding the nature of the disability, was sufficient to establish the employer’s knowledge required under § 23-1065(C). We have jurisdiction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Garrison v. LukeArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Gilbane Co. v. PoulasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools v. ThorellNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API