Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1971No. 10197-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice:

Plaintiff, Ruth Audrey Watkins, brought an action to recover as beneficiary under an accident insurance policy in which her deceased husband was the insured. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant, Underwriters at Lloyds, London, upon testimony that the fatal heart attack in question would not have occurred “but for” certain heart disease. The Court of Appeals reversed the directed verdict, 12 Ariz.App. 539, 473 P.2d 464 (1970), holding that questions of fact were pre-. sented which required determination by a jury.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. For…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Dickerson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GreberArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Greber v. New York Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Watkins v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dale G. Button and Glorianna Button, Husband and Wife v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Cigna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Central National Life Insurance Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. State Compensation Fund v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Huff v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Valley National Bank v. J. C. Penney InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API