Chaudet v. Stone
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 43 — APPRENTICING APPEAL PROM MARSHALL COMMON PLEAS COURT. [Brief missing.] CITED— Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, art. 1, chap. 64, 2 Stanton, 136. Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, art. 3, chap. 86, 2 Stanton, 304. Revised Statutes, sec. 1, art. 2, chap. 37, 1 Stanton, 502. Revised Statutes, sec. 27, chap. 106, 2 Stanton, 465. Hardin, 442; Davis vs. Ditto. 4 Bibb, 336; Watson vs. Morrison. 4 Bibb, 86; Mcllvoy vs. Speed. 4 Bibb, 510 ; Wallace vs. Usher. 1 Met., 282; Todd vs.…
Read the full summary
CASE 43 — APPRENTICING APPEAL PROM MARSHALL COMMON PLEAS COURT. [Brief missing.] CITED— Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, art. 1, chap. 64, 2 Stanton, 136. Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, art. 3, chap. 86, 2 Stanton, 304. Revised Statutes, sec. 1, art. 2, chap. 37, 1 Stanton, 502. Revised Statutes, sec. 27, chap. 106, 2 Stanton, 465. Hardin, 442; Davis vs. Ditto. 4 Bibb, 336; Watson vs. Morrison. 4 Bibb, 86; Mcllvoy vs. Speed. 4 Bibb, 510 ; Wallace vs. Usher. 1 Met., 282; Todd vs. Dowd’s heirs. 1 Duvall, 350 ; Thornton vs. McGrath. Civil Code, sec. 543. 2 Duvull, 83; Robinson vs. Redman. 15 B.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HAKDttf
delivered the oíjnion oe the court:
Whether the order of the county court directing Bob Stone to be bound to the appellant was or not void for want of jurisdiction shown therein, is the principal question for the decision of this court on this appeal. It may be conceded, iliat however erroneous the proceedings and order of the county court may have been, yet, if the order be not void, it was sufficient, while unreversed, to invest the appellant with the control of said boy Bob, and gave him a right to maintain an action for a violation of his rights as the master of Bob under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Freeman v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
- Small v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jacobs's adm'r v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- Hatten v. TurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Silbersack v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922