Small v. Small
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 7 — APPRENTICESHIP APPEAL PROM TODD COUNTY COURT. CITED— Civil Code, secs. 579 and 581. 3 Monroe, 9. 1 J. J. M., 307; Coffee, SfC., vs. Watt. Littell’s 2 Dig.
Read the full summary
CASE 7 — APPRENTICESHIP APPEAL PROM TODD COUNTY COURT. CITED— Civil Code, secs. 579 and 581. 3 Monroe, 9. 1 J. J. M., 307; Coffee, SfC., vs. Watt. Littell’s 2 Dig. L. Ky., Master and Apprentice, 677. 6 J. J. M., 592 ; Mendall vs. Ricketts. 6 Dana, 283 ; Freeman vs. Strong. 6 B. Mon., 281; Rachel, of color, vs. Emerson. 2 Marshall, 39 ; Roberts vs. Des Forges. 2 Marshall, 158; Payne vs. Long, Tilford, df-c. 15 B. Mon., 506, 507; Bakers vs. Winfrey. 2 Rev. Stat., 136. Myers’ Supplement, p. 730, sec. 4. CITED— Sec. 4, act of 1866, Myers’ Sup., 734.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered tiie opinion oe the court:
This is not an appeal from, the order of the county-court, binding Washington Small to the appellee, but an appeal from the judgment of the county court refusing to vacate said order on the petition of said Washington, filed by his next friend for that purpose ; and the first question involved is, whether, in this proceeding, the court had jurisdiction to set aside its order made at a previous term.
It is insisted for the appellant that the case is embraced by section 579 of the Civil Code, enumerating certain causes for which a court may vacate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Freeman v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silbersack v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Chaudet v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868