Legal Opinion

Silbersack v. Kraft

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 28, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hurt

Affirming.

The .controversy in this action arises from a difference of opinion as to what authority is authorized to appoint a commissioner or superintendent of the poor, or as such person is ordinarily called a poor-house keeper. The county court claiming the authority appointed the appellant, while the fiscal court claiming that .such was a matter within the domain of its powers, designated the appellee, Kraft, to exercise the duties, which, under the system adopted in 'Campbell county, are required of the commissioner or superintendent ¡of the poor,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell County v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Gilbert v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  3. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Kilbourn v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Freeman v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leslie County v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Bath County v. United Disinfectant Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Lee ex rel. Dawson v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  4. Farmer v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Delph v. Clay CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API