Legal Opinion

Heath v. Kettenhofen

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1965No. Civ. 21487PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Plaintiffs Heath and defendant Kettenhofen are owners of adjacent parcels of land. Each party has filed an action against the other. Their dispute concerns the existence, extent and proper use of an easement across the northerly 40 feet of defendant’s land. Plaintiffs’ action sought declaratory relief, to quiet title and an injunction. Defendant’s action sought reformation of the deed by which the common grantor of the parties granted the disputed easement to plaintiffs. Although each party, is both a plaintiff and a defendant, for convenience the Heaths will hereafter be referred to as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Dolske v. GormleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Blackmore v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Goodman v. Community Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. BechtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API