Poole v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
At issue in this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult, in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-932, 22-933 and 22-936(a) (2001), and whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to allow appellant to recall Mark Lee, the testifying victim, for further cross examination. Discerning no error on either ground, we affirm.
I
Appellant first contends that his conviction for criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult is unsupported by sufficient evidence because the government failed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hilton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- United States v. BamiduroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Medina v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Moten v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wilson v. HayesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010