Legal Opinion

Hilton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1981No. 79-290, 79-314, 79-353, 79-358, and 79-311PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial, each appellant was convicted of three counts of armed robbery, D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-2901, -3202. In addition, appellants Ronnie Hilton, Melvin Hilton and James Livingston were each convicted of two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon, D.C.Code 1973 § 22-502, and one count of carrying a pistol without a license, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204, and appellant Jerome Graham was convicted of two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon and one count of possession of a prohibited weapon, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3214(b). The charges stemmed from the robbery…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API