Legal Opinion

Bollay v. Office of Administrative Law

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 2011No. C063268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*106Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.

The property line between publicly owned tidelands and contiguous upland property is known as the mean high tide line. That line is not constant; it changes over time with the level of the sea and the erosion or buildup of the shore.

This case is a challenge to a policy of the State Lands Commission (Lands Commission) prohibiting development seaward of the most landward historical position of the mean high tide line. The challenge is limited to the argument that the Lands Commission’s policy is a regulation and, therefore, is not valid because it is an underground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Morning Star Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State of California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Cal. Build. Ind. Assn. v. Bay Area Air Qual. Mgmt. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Moelleken v. Jones CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Rossiter v. Lightbourne CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. St. of CA v. Continental Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API