Legal Opinion

Rossiter v. Lightbourne CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 2015No. C071629Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/20/15 Rossiter v. Lightbourne CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ALEXIS ROSSITER, C071629 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2010- 80000527-CU-WM-GDS) v. WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, etc., et al.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Priest v. Regents of the UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API