Legal Opinion

Trower v. Stonebraker-Zea Live Stock Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1937No. 2397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county, Okl., and has been removed to this court by petition, because of diversity of citizenship. A motion to remand the cause to the state court is on for consideration.

Plaintiffs’ amended petition alleges, in substance, that the plaintiffs are residents of Tulsa county, and are engaged in the business of listing leases and selling oil and gas leases and other property; that the defendant, Stonebraker-Zea Live Stock Company, is a corporation, chartered in the state of Oklahoma, owning property in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Coal Co. v. BlatchfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  5. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Leibson v. HenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  5. 7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1031, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,306 W. P. Moore, Virgil A. Hundtofte and Life Science Products Company, a Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API