Legal Opinion

U.M. v. District Court in & for the County of Larimer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 13, 1981No. 81SA169PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, the petitioners (a mother, S.M., and her child, U.M.) seek to prohibit the Larimer County District Court from changing the venue of their action under the Uniform Parentage Act 1 from Larimer County to the City and County of Denver. We issued a rule to show cause why the change of venue should not be prohibited; we now make that rule absolute.

The petitioners bought an action in Lar-imer County District Court pursuant to the Uniform Parentage Act, seeking to establish that T.R. is the father of the child, U.M. TR. moved for a change of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Conrad v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Alvarez v. District Ct. in & for City & Cty. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Davis v. ConourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. People ex rel. Lackey v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Stephen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Smith, Jr.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API