Legal Opinion

Davis v. Conour

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1972No. 25537PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

This is an original proceeding under C.A.R. 21 in which we issued a rule for the water judge of Water Division No. 3 of the State to show cause. The question involved is whether the water judges of the State had jurisdiction to adjudicate the priority of small water wells under 1969 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 148-21-45 prior to its amendment in 1972. In a carefully worded opinion, which obviously was the product of comprehensive study, the water judge concluded that he did not have such jurisdiction. He therefore dismissed the applications under which such adjudication was sought. We interpret…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. St. Luke's Hospital v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Schlagel v. HoelskenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Bowman v. EldherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Cline v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. City of Lakewood v. MavromatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Martin v. Montezuma-Cortez School District Re-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. U.M. v. District Court in & for the County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API