Legal Opinion
Blake v. Cuneo
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1941No. 27996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is a second appeal. Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co., 178 Okla. 198, 62 P. 2d 82.
By the law of the case Cuneo et al. are vested with a servient estate to cer tain land over which the St. Louis & S. F. Railway Company has an easement and upon which is located the railroad right of way. Cuneo et al. derived title from Mary J. McMeachan, who platted and sold block 23, Central Park addition to Oklahoma City.
After reversal Mary J. McMeachan intervened, but her pleading was stricken. She appeals, contending that Cuneo et al. did not plead an interest in land outside their lot lines, i. e., they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Devlin v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McFadden v. SwinertonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Florida Central Railroad v. BisbeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
- Linson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. BruceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001