Legal Opinion
Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 1943No. 31191PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The property here involved is a 20-foot strip along the south end of two city lots.
Plaintiffs claim as successor to the heirs of C. B. Ames, and as heirs of John Holzapfel. Defendant Alexander Drug Company claims under a conveyance executed by said Ames and Holz-apfel during their lives.
Essential facts are that in 1902 Ames and Holzapfel owned all of the two city lots, which were one hundred and forty-five (145) feet long. On April 16th of that year they conveyed the disputed strip to a railway company for right of way or switch track, with provision for reversion to them, their heirs or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Coxl v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Van Winkle v. . Van WinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Rox Petroleum, L.L.C. v. New Dominion, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Saak v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Bonebrake v. McNeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.