Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Young
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 13, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-455PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEANOR, District Judge.
The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. Following the filing of briefs directed to the issues raised in these motions, as well as to the issue of this court’s jurisdiction, arguments were heard and decision was reserved. Due consideration having been given to the arguments advanced by the parties, the court has concluded that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be denied on the grounds that the state regulation in question is not in conflict with the federal statute and regulation. For the reasons that appear below, judgment will…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burton v. NJ DEP'T OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Barrera v. Dept. of Institutions and AgenciesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979