Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1979No. 77-719Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice White

In order for there to be federal district court jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1343 (3), two requirements must be met. First, the suit must be “authorized by law,” and, second, the suit must seek redress of a deprivation under color of state law of any right “secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights . ...”1 Title 42 U. S. C. § 1983 provides a cause of action for deprivations under color of state law of any right “secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States.2 I agree with the Court’s conclusion that, even assuming…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API