Legal Opinion

Amerio Contact Plate Freezers, Inc. v. Frank W. Knowles

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 14, 1960No. 15150_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s assignor, who had been the losing party in an interference proceeding in the Patent Office, filed a complaint against appellee, the successful party in that proceeding, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Appellee, a resident of the Western District of the State of Washington, was not served with process in the District of Columbia. He appeared specially and moved to dismiss appellant’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The District Court granted the motion.

The patent law provides: “Any party to an interference dissatisfied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Petroleum Financial Corp. v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. Schiller v. Mit-Clip Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. Orion Shipping and Trading Company, a Corporation, and Pacific Cargo Carriers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. WelchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marve A. Dubin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Adolph Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  5. Henry L. Hayes v. Frank W. LivermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API