Legal Opinion
Petroleum Financial Corp. v. Stone
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1953PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for a rehearing on that part of my decision of August 17, 1953 denying its motion to vacate the order, D.C., 111 F.Supp. 351, setting aside the service of the summons on two of the defendants in this case and dismissing the action as to them and, if I do not change my views on the question of service, that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Counsel for' defendants oppose this motion.
The question, of the sufficiency of service involved in the motion for rehearing has been ruled upon twice and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Action Embroidery Corp. v. Atlantic Embroidery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- GOLDLAWR, INCORPORATED v. ShubertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Adolph Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Orzulak v. Federal Commerce and Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.