Legal Opinion
Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. Thomsen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1955No. Nos. 6855, 6856PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Chief Judge.
These are applications for writs of mandamus to require Judge Thomsen. *515•one of the District Judges of the District •of Maryland, to accept jurisdiction in two suits in admiralty transferred to that •district from the Southern District of New York and to grant to libellants such relief as may be proper in said suits. The suits were instituted in the Southern District of New York, to recover on account of the failure of the S. S. Karachi to deliver cargo. Both suits were filed within the twelve months period of limitation prescribed by bills of lading and the Carriage of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marve A. Dubin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Datasouth Computer Corp. v. Three Dimensional Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.