Schiller v. Mit-Clip Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The plaintiff sues under the Anti-Trust Acts to recover -damages, caused by a conspiracy between the corporate defendant and its treasurer, by which they are seeking to acquire a monopoly in the sale of “elas tic glove attachments,” by fraudulently threatening the plaintiff’s customers with litigation upon “alleged patent rights.” The treasurer (who has never been served) is a resident of Minnesota; the corporate defendant was organized under the law of that state; the plaintiff is a resident of New York. The defendants moved 1 to dismiss the action because the corporation had never done…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Schultz v. AryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- Concession Consultants, Inc. v. MirischCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Concession Consultants, Inc. v. MirischCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Petroleum Financial Corp. v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.