Legal Opinion

Schiller v. Mit-Clip Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 17, 1950No. 21428_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sues under the Anti-Trust Acts to recover -damages, caused by a conspiracy between the corporate defendant and its treasurer, by which they are seeking to acquire a monopoly in the sale of “elas tic glove attachments,” by fraudulently threatening the plaintiff’s customers with litigation upon “alleged patent rights.” The treasurer (who has never been served) is a resident of Minnesota; the corporate defendant was organized under the law of that state; the plaintiff is a resident of New York. The defendants moved 1 to dismiss the action because the corporation had never done…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. GoldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Schultz v. AryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Concession Consultants, Inc. v. MirischCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Concession Consultants, Inc. v. MirischCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Petroleum Financial Corp. v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API