Legal Opinion
Faulkner v. National Geographic Society
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 23, 2003No. 97 CIV. 9361(LAK), 99 CIV. 12488(LAK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Faulkner in No. 97 Civ. 9361 and plaintiffs in No. 99 Civ. 12488 move for reconsideration of this Court’s decision of December 11, 2003, on the ground that the Court erred as a matter of law and should have recused itself. The motion is. denied.
Little need be said about the claim of legal error. Reconsideration would be warranted only if the Court had overlooked controlling or persuasive authority or misapprehended the facts. Movants’ memorandum suggests neither. Movants simply disagree with the decision. That is a basis for appeal but not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. CorleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Gilbert v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Conklin v. Warrington TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. KerikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.