Legal Opinion

Cox v. Haworth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 99PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

I

Plaintiff filed suit on 15 July 1980 alleging that defendants had negligently performed a myelogram procedure on her husband, Alfred W. Cox, on or about 14 July 1978 and had performed the myelogram without his informed consent. She alleged that as a result of the myelogram procedure her husband developed spinal cord arachnoiditis that left him permanently disabled and sexually impotent. Because of his disability she has suffered the loss of her husband’s general companionship and conjugal society and affection and has also suffered the loss of sexual gratification in her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Fowler v. ValencourtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. Lee IkezawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API