Anonymous v. Anonymous
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlfred J. Weiner, J.
In this disputed paternity proceeding, the attorney for the respondent has filed a notice of motion requesting that the petitioner be directed to submit to a polygraph examination. The motion is opposed.
It is well established, that polygraph evidence, because it is not scientifically reliable, is not admissible in this State. (See People v. Forte, 279 N. Y. 204; People v. Leone, 25 N Y 2d 511; People v. Dobler, 29 Misc 2d 481; Matter of Tree v. Ralston, 62 Misc 2d 582.) (To the contrary, see Matter of Stenzel, 71 Misc 2d 719; Walther v. O’Connell, 72 Misc 2d 316.)
It was held in People v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ForteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Dolan v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. Dobler, New York County Courts1961
- Walther v. O'ConnellCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Stenzel v. BNew York City Family Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pereira v. PereiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1974