Legal Opinion
United States v. Rusher
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1992No. Nos. 91-5375, 91-5379 and 91-5381PublishedCited by 463 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
A highway patrolman stopped, searched, and discovered drugs and firearms in a pickup truck driven by defendant James Joseph Flannery and occupied by defendants David Rusher (“David”) and his wife Sarah Rusher (“Sarah”). Flannery and the Rushers were convicted in the Middle District of North Carolina of possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine and psilocin. On appeal, defendants argue, among other things, that the district court erred in not suppressing the evidence seized from the truck. The defendants also appeal their sentences: all three argue that…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by463 opinions
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ManiganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
458 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.