Legal Opinion

United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar Parker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1993No. 92-4822PublishedCited by 367 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants Mateen Yusuf Sha-bazz (Shabazz) and Keith Lamar Parker (Parker) were convicted on drug possession charges. They argue that evidence discovered in a warrantless search of the car in which they were traveling should have been suppressed, that the trial court erroneously failed to submit a “mere presence” jury instruction, and that their convictions rest on insufficient evidence. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

On July 10, 1991, Shabazz and Parker were traveling in a 1976 Chevrolet Malibu on Interstate 10 in Beaumont, Texas, when they were pulled…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by367 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. United States v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API