Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided December 3, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 5994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEDDY, Chief Judge.

I. FACTS.

Petitioner William J. Smith, Jr. moves this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and conviction. Petitioner alleges that a plea of guilty was accepted by the late Honorable Ernest W. Gibson in violation of revised Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and that his plea of guilty was not voluntary nor made with understanding of the nature of the charge and that there was no finding by this Court that a factual basis existed for acceptance of the plea.

II. THE APPLICATION OF RULE 11

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Robert Bye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. X v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. X v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API