Legal Opinion
Bay Hill Construction, Inc. v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 2003No. AC 22651; AC 22652PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Bay Hill Construction, Inc., appeals from the judgments of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants, the city of Waterbury (city) and its board of tax review (board). The trial court refused to reduce the valuation of the plaintiffs property located at 42 Gayridge Road in Waterbury. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly determined that the highest and best use of the plaintiffs condominium units for tax assessment purposes was as condominiums instead of as rental apartments. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The court found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Torres v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ireland v. Town of WethersfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Saybrook Point Marina Partnership v. Town of Old SaybrookConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eisenberg v. TuchmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of East WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Dallaire v. HsuConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Avery v. MedinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- M. B. v. S. A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019