Legal Opinion
Sloane-Wheeller Corp. v. Odiseos
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 17, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
In 1906, a tract of land in Greenwich known as The Maples was divided into forty lots. All of them were subject to similar building and use restrictions, thereby giving each grantee the right to enforce the restrictions against any other grantee. Maganini v. Hodgson, 138 Conn. 188, 192, 82 A.2d 801.
The plaintiffs, who are the present owners of six of these lots, brought this action, seeking to have their lots declared relieved from the deed restrictions. They claim that over the years the character of The Maples has so changed that the purpose of the original scheme of restrictions has been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benz v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bickell v. MoraioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Wenzel v. Town of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Lomas and Nettleton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Maganini v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Kelman v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Mannweiler v. LaFlammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Manley v. PfeifferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.