Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 2002No. 9906-45681; A109658PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from her conviction for failure to appear on a citation for reckless driving. Former ORS 133.075 (1997), repealed by Or Laws 1999, ch 1051, § 63. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state failed to prove that she acted knowingly, a required element of the offense. She also assigns error to the trial court’s failure to acquit her sua sponte because the state adduced no evidence that the citation was issued “under authority of ORS 133.045 to 133.080, 133.110 and 156.050,” another required element of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. NewcomerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Gambee v. Department of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API