Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 23, 2006No. C 04-04507 JWPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MBNA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON’S REQUEST FOR FINDING OF BAD FAITH; SETTING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RULE 11 SANCTIONS
WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
John Gorman (“Gorman” or “Plaintiff’) alleges libel and violations of various state and federal fair credit reporting and debt collection statutes against MBNA and MBNA’s attorney, Wolpoff & Abramson, (“Wolpoff,” collectively “Defendants”). MBNA and Wolpoff each filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Edwards v. Toys" R" USDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rambarran v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Sanai v. SaltzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.