Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 2009No. 18-17308PublishedCited by 436 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed January 12, 2009, is hereby amended. The amended opinion is attached hereto.
With these amendments, the panel unanimously has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and Appel-lee’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by436 opinions
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Edward Seamans v. Temple UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Chiang v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Simmsparris v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- John Shaw v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
431 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.