Legal Opinion
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority v. B. Crystal & Son
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 26, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Botein, J. P.
The Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority has brought this action to enjoin the maintenance of an advertising sign on the outer wall of the building in which appellant is a tenant. The Authority alleges that the sign is located within 500 feet, and in full view of the approaches to the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, and hence constitutes a violation of the provisions of section 569-b of the Public Authorities Law, imperiling the public peace, safety and health of the City of New York and the persons using the approaches to the tunnel. Appellant admits the existence and location of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carr v. New York State Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- London Terrace Gardens v. StevensCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Incorporated Village of Old Field v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996