Solano v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The insureds appeal a final summary judgment in favor of State Farm, their property insurer, on their claim that State Farm failed to pay a property damage claim. The trial court held that, because the insureds had not appeared for an examination under oath as required by the policy provisions, they failed to comply with a condition precedent to suit, resulting in judgment for State Farm and a forfeiture of benefits. The record, however, reveals that disputed issues of fact remain as to the extent of the Solanos’ compliance with the policy provisions. We therefore reverse.
The insureds, Dr.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Haiman v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Robin CurranSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Sunshine State Insurance Co. v. CorridoriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. FigueroaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- CELERINA NUNEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- CELERINA NUNEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- ENRIQUE ARGUELLO and YAHOSKA ARGUELLO v. PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- ESTATE OF ROSEMARIE WOLFE, through its personal representative ROBB MAASS, esq. v. 224 VIA MARILA LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.