Haiman v. Federal Ins. Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
798 So.2d 811 (2001)
Matthew HAIMAN, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D01-800.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
October 24, 2001.
Bill Ullman, Miami, for appellant.
David W. Molhem of Strickland, Molhem & Fraley, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.
WARNER, J.
In appellant's suit to pay an insured loss of a watch, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee insurance company on two grounds: (1) that appellant made a misrepresentation of material fact related to the claim; and (2) that he failed to comply with document production demanded by appellee…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Diamonds & Denims, Inc. v. First of Georgia InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Beneby v. Midland Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by39 opinions
- Starling v. Allstate Floridian Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Allstate Floridian Insurance Co. v. FarmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Sunshine State Insurance Co. v. CorridoriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- SCW West LLC v. Westport InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. BasdeoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.