Legal Opinion

Haiman v. Federal Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 24, 2001No. 4D01-800PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

798 So.2d 811 (2001)

Matthew HAIMAN, Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D01-800.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 24, 2001.

Bill Ullman, Miami, for appellant.

David W. Molhem of Strickland, Molhem & Fraley, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

WARNER, J.

In appellant's suit to pay an insured loss of a watch, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee insurance company on two grounds: (1) that appellant made a misrepresentation of material fact related to the claim; and (2) that he failed to comply with document production demanded by appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Diamonds & Denims, Inc. v. First of Georgia InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Beneby v. Midland Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Starling v. Allstate Floridian Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Allstate Floridian Insurance Co. v. FarmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Sunshine State Insurance Co. v. CorridoriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. SCW West LLC v. Westport InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. BasdeoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API