Legal Opinion

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Figueroa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 2017No. 4D15-2698PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

State Farm raises two issues in this appeal of a final judgment entered for the insured. State Farm argues first that the trial court erred in denying its summary judgment and directed verdict motions because the insured failed to timely comply with policy obligations following the loss. State Farm also argues that, at a minimum, a new trial is required because the introduction of the insured’s health issues at trial was both irrelevant and highly prejudicial.

We reject the first issue because the insured’s substantial compliance with her post-loss obligations under the policy involved issues…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Frank Special v. West Boca Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DAVID HIMMEL v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. CELERINA NUNEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  3. CELERINA NUNEZ v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. MARCO HUERTAS and MIOZOTI HUERTAS v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  5. Monterey at Malibu Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Empire Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API